Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Mission Possible World Health International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
Telephone: 770-242-2599

Posted: 06 February 2018

From: Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.,
Date: Mon, Feb 05, 2018 6:10 am
Subject: Personal Note to Editor and Operation Head of MensXP

To the Editor:

Your staff writer, Rachit Dua, wrote an article "What the fuss about artificial sweeteners". You need to remove or better still publish my letter. Aspartame is a killing machine. For 28 years I've worked with the world experts to alert everyone on this planet that aspartame is an additive, excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic, genetically engineered drugs, adjuvant (immune stimulator) and teratogen. There is no safe dose. Here is an article I wrote about it direct from congressional records: I never have trouble getting men off of it because it damages the hypothalamus and causes male sexual dysfunction and most men would rather that not happen: This is by Dr. James Bowen. He also wrote about the FDA years ago on how deadly it is, and he should know he is not only a chemical genius and physician but he has Lou Gehrigs disease from it.

Original letter sent to FDA twenty years ago:

Lansing, MI 48910

My statement for the public record regarding food labeling and the aspartame issue is serious if not somewhat facetious at times. The reason for this is because I have found little evidence of honesty, integrity or stability on the part of Food & Drug Administration officials regarding the aspartame issue, since its approval in 1981. This attitude is largely shared by the general public. I come in contact with approximately two new people each week who are now being or who have in the past been poisoned by aspartame.

All of them share the same reactions that it is not worth writing to the FDA or NutraSweet, because you and your agency have run amuck and are no longer a valid public benefactor.

The recent revelations about the problems surrounding generic drug approvals are compelling evidence of what happens when an agency considered itself above the law in dealing with these matters. In my opinion, this has resulted in the mass poisoning of the American public as well as seventy-plus countries in the rest of the world. Watching FDA officials walk through the "revolving door" and be further rewarded by being promoted to other positions of high public responsibility is clear evidence of a government out of control.

For this reason, I am opposed to labeling aspartame content of food and drinks. To do so would imply that the government is taking some sort of responsible action...when the only responsible action would be to immediately take aspartame off the market, fully disclose its toxicities, offer full compensation to the injured, public and criminally prosecute anyone who participated in the fraudulent placement of aspartame on the marketplace. That includes those who work so diligently to keep in on the market as well.

Further, to label the purported aspartame content of a product would cover a number of toxic flaws in the product and its allowable daily intake (ADI) as follows:

  1. That the amount stated on the label was accurate and factual rather than theoretical. Aspartame breaks down relatively quickly in solution. Given the well established modus operandi of the manufacturer, there is no concern given the ultimate consumer. And cover-ups seem to be a part of the routine of doing business. The public should be well advised that the amounts really used in liquid products are relatively greater than those stated to accomplish a relative compensation for the loss of product sweetness occurring during storage in solution.

  2. That the ADI presently allowed is 50% greater than that expected to cause a reversal of the phenylalanine/tyrosine ratios in the human brain. This has profoundly bad implications for the human being, including dopamine and serotonin synthesis inhibition, causing depression, appetite changes, mental inabilities, increased susceptibility to seizures and a host of neurohormonal problems.

  3. Every known metabolite of aspartame is of marked or questionable toxicity and patently unsafe for human use. Methyl alcohol is metabolized to nascent formaldehyde in the eye, nervous system and other metabolically active organs. It immediately attacks and denatures the tissue structure proteins in which is metabolized to nascent formaldehyde. This stimulates specific organ and subcellular autoimmunity which seems to be a preponderant source of the bad experiences reported by NutraSweet victims. Aspartic Acid is a neuroexcitotoxic present in damaging amounts, it own right, at the ADI for aspartame. Simple logic tells one that it will vastly increase the metabolism of methyl alcohol to formaldehyde attach there. This corresponds well with the symptomalogies often experienced, such as Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS), bulbar palsies, neurohormonal disorders, diketopiperazine issue remains totally unresolved and dangerous. The amino acids that are released by hydrolysis, form eimers and isomers that are either not sufficiently studied, or which are known substrates in undesirable pathological states such as Alzheimer's disease.

  4. There is the issue of the approval of aspartame for market, which has violated every principle of responsible science and responsible government. Everyone responsible for this hearing should at least completely review the approval process and the comments of the participants and observers who have so excellently elucidated all the malfeasance for the public record, such as Dr. Adrian Gross and many, many others (all on the public record).

    In light of the above 4 points, I highly recommend that you deny in every way possible any subterfuge of respectability that the aspartame people have enshrouded themselves and their product within hopes of quickly denying its access to the worldwide marketplace. I write this, not believing that it will do the slightest bit of good in the sense of affecting the labeling issue per se, but that instead, it might reach some honest, concerned, conscientious individuals in the process.


I just wrote an article for Op-Ed News:

Here is the Aspartame Resource Guide which will also go into Splenda which was developed by insecticide researchers and causing horrible reactions, especially bad for diabetics: Note all the medical text on aspartame like "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic", 1000 pages of symptoms and diseases triggered or precipitated by aspartame. It was written by the late Dr. H. J. Roberts, world expert. Also "While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills" by Dr. Woodrow Monte,

Read the last chapter free on autism on this web site and remember if a man uses aspartame at the time of conception he can cause his child to be born with birth defects. The resource guide also has a safe sweetener, "Just Like Sugar", made from organic food. Wha'ts the fuss about artificial sweeteners. Some are just plain poison. Here is a radio show I recently did on aspartame:

Aspartame Known As A Poison Worldwide | The Power Hour | Nation ...

Nov 14, 2017 - Aspartame was listed with the pentagon in an inventory of prospective biochemical warfare weapons submitted to Congress. (Ecologist, Aspartame, 2005: 2. Studies were done at Ft. Detrick where other poisonous substances are tested. 3. Aspartame ...

Anyone who writes about a subject needs to research first and this writer used industry propaganda. Notice Dr. Adrian Gross in "No Safe Dose of Aspartame" who was the FDA chief scientist who investigated aspartame told Congress it violated the Delaney Amendment because it caused cancer and therefore FDA should not have been able to set an allowable dose. He tried to have G. D. Searle indicted for fraud but both US Prosecutors hired on with the defense team and the statute of limitations expired.

You can find more information on my web site, and other web sites listed below. Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Founder, Mission Possible World Health International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097

Aspartame Toxicity Center:

You need to correct this article immediately.